![]() |
Single Instructor, Multiple Term/Course Report |
|
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
COURSE-INSTRUCTOR OPINION SURVEY RESPONSE REPORTS
Single Instructor Set
Unofficial Copy
term: 200805 |
course: INTA6306 SS
|
instructor: Dion, Michelle Lynn |
class size: 3 |
CRN: 55191 |
Core Questions |
||||||||
Item |
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Partially Agree and Partially Disagree |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
N/A |
No.of Resp. |
Interpolated Median |
1. Course Seemed Well Planned And Organized |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5.0 |
2. Good Job Covering Course Objectives/Content |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5.0 |
3. Explained Complex Material Clearly |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4.0 |
4. Was Approachable And Willing To Assist |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4.5 |
5. Encouraged Students To Consult With Him/Her |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5.0 |
6. Class Attendance Important In Promoting Learning Of Material |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4.0 |
7. Number Of Course Assignments Was Appropriate. |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4.5 |
8. Exams Covered Course Content/Objectives |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
4.0 |
9. Exams And Quizzes Were Of Appropriate Difficulty. |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5.0 |
10. The Instructor Was An Effective Teacher |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5.0 |
Unofficial Copy
term: 200608 |
course: INTA6003 S
|
instructor: Dion, Michelle Lynn |
class size: 21 |
CRN: 81640 |
Core Questions |
||||||||
Item |
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Partially Agree and Partially Disagree |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
N/A |
No.of Resp. |
Interpolated Median |
1. Course Seemed Well Planned And Organized |
8 |
7 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
4.2 |
2. Good Job Covering Course Objectives/Content |
4 |
13 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
4.0 |
3. Explained Complex Material Clearly |
4 |
5 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
19 |
3.4 |
4. Was Approachable And Willing To Assist |
13 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
4.7 |
5. Encouraged Students To Consult With Him/Her |
15 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
4.8 |
6. Class Attendance Important In Promoting Learning Of Material |
14 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
4.8 |
7. Number Of Course Assignments Was Appropriate. |
6 |
7 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
3.9 |
8. Exams Covered Course Content/Objectives |
3 |
10 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
3.8 |
9. Exams And Quizzes Were Of Appropriate Difficulty. |
4 |
9 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
3.8 |
10. The Instructor Was An Effective Teacher |
8 |
10 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
20 |
4.3 |
Unofficial Copy
term: 200602 |
course: INTA6003 S
|
instructor: Dion, Michelle Lynn |
class size: 13 |
CRN: 23990 |
Core Questions |
||||||||
Item |
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Partially Agree and Partially Disagree |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
N/A |
No.of Resp. |
Interpolated Median |
1. Course Seemed Well Planned And Organized |
7 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
4.6 |
2. Good Job Covering Course Objectives/Content |
4 |
8 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
4.2 |
3. Explained Complex Material Clearly |
5 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
4.2 |
4. Was Approachable And Willing To Assist |
11 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
4.9 |
5. Encouraged Students To Consult With Him/Her |
11 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
4.9 |
6. Class Attendance Important In Promoting Learning Of Material |
10 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
4.9 |
7. Number Of Course Assignments Was Appropriate. |
4 |
5 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
13 |
4.0 |
8. Exams Covered Course Content/Objectives |
3 |
7 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
4.1 |
9. Exams And Quizzes Were Of Appropriate Difficulty. |
4 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
4.2 |
10. The Instructor Was An Effective Teacher |
7 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
4.6 |
Unofficial Copy
term: 200602 |
course: INTA6302 S
|
instructor: Dion, Michelle Lynn |
class size: 16 |
CRN: 25393 |
Core Questions |
||||||||
Item |
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Partially Agree and Partially Disagree |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
N/A |
No.of Resp. |
Interpolated Median |
1. Course Seemed Well Planned And Organized |
14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
5.0 |
2. Good Job Covering Course Objectives/Content |
12 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
4.9 |
3. Explained Complex Material Clearly |
11 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
4.9 |
4. Was Approachable And Willing To Assist |
14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
5.0 |
5. Encouraged Students To Consult With Him/Her |
14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
5.0 |
6. Class Attendance Important In Promoting Learning Of Material |
13 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
5.0 |
7. Number Of Course Assignments Was Appropriate. |
12 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
4.9 |
8. Exams Covered Course Content/Objectives |
12 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
4.9 |
9. Exams And Quizzes Were Of Appropriate Difficulty. |
11 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
4.9 |
10. The Instructor Was An Effective Teacher |
13 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
5.0 |
Unofficial Copy
term: 200508 |
course: INTA6003 S
|
instructor: Dion, Michelle Lynn |
class size: 21 |
CRN: 81825 |
Core Questions |
||||||||
Item |
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Partially Agree and Partially Disagree |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
N/A |
No.of Resp. |
Interpolated Median |
1. Course Seemed Well Planned And Organized |
2 |
7 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
18 |
3.5 |
2. Good Job Covering Course Objectives/Content |
3 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
18 |
3.5 |
3. Explained Complex Material Clearly |
1 |
5 |
7 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
18 |
3.1 |
4. Was Approachable And Willing To Assist |
9 |
2 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
18 |
4.5 |
5. Encouraged Students To Consult With Him/Her |
8 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
17 |
4.4 |
6. Class Attendance Important In Promoting Learning Of Material |
7 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
18 |
4.2 |
7. Number Of Course Assignments Was Appropriate. |
2 |
6 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
18 |
3.4 |
8. Exams Covered Course Content/Objectives |
2 |
7 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
18 |
3.5 |
9. Exams And Quizzes Were Of Appropriate Difficulty. |
3 |
9 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
18 |
3.8 |
10. The Instructor Was An Effective Teacher |
5 |
7 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
18 |
3.9 |
Unofficial Copy
term: 200508 |
course: INTA6302 S
|
instructor: Dion, Michelle Lynn |
class size: 14 |
CRN: 81829 |
Core Questions |
||||||||
Item |
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Partially Agree and Partially Disagree |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
N/A |
No.of Resp. |
Interpolated Median |
1. Course Seemed Well Planned And Organized |
2 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
4.0 |
2. Good Job Covering Course Objectives/Content |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
7 |
3.0 |
3. Explained Complex Material Clearly |
1 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
7 |
3.7 |
4. Was Approachable And Willing To Assist |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
3.8 |
5. Encouraged Students To Consult With Him/Her |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
3.3 |
6. Class Attendance Important In Promoting Learning Of Material |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
4.3 |
7. Number Of Course Assignments Was Appropriate. |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
3.8 |
8. Exams Covered Course Content/Objectives |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
4.3 |
9. Exams And Quizzes Were Of Appropriate Difficulty. |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
4.3 |
10. The Instructor Was An Effective Teacher |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
7 |
3.0 |
Unofficial Copy
term: 200402 |
course: INTA6003 S
|
instructor: Dion, Michelle Lynn |
class size: 19 |
CRN: 26189 |
Core Questions |
||||||||
Item |
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Partially Agree and Partially Disagree |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
N/A |
No.of Resp. |
Interpolated Median |
1. Course Seemed Well Planned And Organized |
2 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
11 |
3.4 |
2. Good Job Covering Course Objectives/Content |
4 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
3.4 |
3. Explained Complex Material Clearly |
1 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
11 |
2.9 |
4. Was Approachable And Willing To Assist |
2 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
3.6 |
5. Encouraged Students To Consult With Him/Her |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
3.8 |
6. Class Attendance Important In Promoting Learning Of Material |
4 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
4.2 |
7. Number Of Assignments Was Reasonable |
1 |
6 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
3.8 |
8. Exams Covered Course Content/Objectives |
1 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
3.6 |
9. Exams Were Of Appropriate Difficulty |
1 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
11 |
3.6 |
10. The Instructor Was An Effective Teacher |
2 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
3.8 |
Unofficial Copy
term: 200308 |
course: INTA6003 S
|
instructor: Dion, Michelle Lynn |
class size: 24 |
CRN: 82325 |
Core Questions |
||||||||
Item |
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Partially Agree and Partially Disagree |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
N/A |
No.of Resp. |
Interpolated Median |
1. Course Seemed Well Planned And Organized |
3 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
4.2 |
2. Good Job Covering Course Objectives/Content |
3 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
4.2 |
3. Explained Complex Material Clearly |
4 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
4.3 |
4. Was Approachable And Willing To Assist |
7 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
4.9 |
5. Encouraged Students To Consult With Him/Her |
7 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
4.9 |
6. Class Attendance Important In Promoting Learning Of Material |
6 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
4.8 |
7. Number Of Assignments Was Reasonable |
4 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
4.4 |
8. Exams Covered Course Content/Objectives |
4 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
4.4 |
9. Exams Were Of Appropriate Difficulty |
4 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
4.5 |
10. The Instructor Was An Effective Teacher |
5 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
4.6 |
If you have any questions or comments about
this site, please email the
Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) at cetlhelp@gatech.edu
For general information, please check the
CETL CIOS web pages
and the CIOS help pages.