President of the PRI runs 10K race

Over the weekend, the President of the PRI and one of that party’s pre-candidates for President in 2006, participated in a 10K race here in the D.F. Madrazo’s time was 51 minutes, 25 seconds.


From La Jornada

As you can see, Madrazo conveniently had the number 2006 for the race. When asked by reporters if he had requested that number, he said no, that it was assigned him at registration, with a smile. If you buy that, I have a nice pond in Parque Mexico that I’d like to rent to you.

Small parties in 2006

For those interested in the 2006 presidential election, there’s a great article in today’s El Universal that discusses the strategies of the small parties with official recognition for 2006.

A summary:

Partido del Trabajo:
1. Candidatura propia en unión con movimientos sociales.
2. Coalición con Convergencia.
3. Alianza con el PRD y Convergencia. El candidato sería perredista.
4. Aliarse con el PRI.

Partido Convergencia:
1. Coalición, con el PRD y con el PT. El candidato sería perredista.
2. Candidatura interna.
3. Candidatura ciudadana o externa. Los probables candidato son hasta ahora Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas y Jorge Castañeda.

Partido Verde Ecologista de México
1. Ha presentado ya a su precandidato, Bernardo de la Garza. No se descarta que se una al PRI.

Partido Nueva Alianza
1. Candidato propio. La apuesta es obtener el mayor número posible de diputados y senadores.
2. Candidato externo.

Partido Alternativa Socialdemócrata
1. Su candidata será Patricia Mercado. No descartan uno externo, entre ellos a Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas y al rector de la UNAM, Juan Ramón de la Fuente. Rechazan a Víctor González y Jorge Castañeda.

Since this will be the first election for the last two parties, they are prohibited from forming a formal alliance with any other party. They will need to present their own candidates.

Of course, it’s interesting to think about the problem from the perspective of the big three parties. When and why do you ally with a smaller party? What do you have to give up in return to get their support? And how do you gauge how many votes such an alliance can bring you?

Absentee voting in 2006

In Mexico. Given the number of Mexicans that reside in the U.S. both legally and illegally, the Mexican government has been debating since 2000 (or maybe even before) the possibility of absentee voting for Mexicans living abroad. I’ve heard stories of many people and personally know at least one person who travelled all the way back to Mexico from the U.S. to vote in the historic 2000 presidential elections.

According to some estimates, nearly 2 million of the 4 million Mexicans estimated to be living in the U.S. with a valid voter ID would be likely to vote in 2006 if legislators approve the proposed electoral reform.

It’s not surprising, then, that Fox’s party, the PAN, has opened a new office in El Paso. The first PAN office was opened at the beginning of May in Chicago, IL.

Spanglish and Beisbol

While in Oaxaca, Brian and I attended my first major league baseball game. In this case, it was major league Mexican baseball. The Oaxaca Warriors (stats) against the Yucatan Lions (stats). We arrived about 30 minutes before the Saturday afternoon game started and bought tickets right behind home plate for $5 each. For a few seconds, there was some uncertainty as I tried to figure out how to say “home plate” to the ticket girl. Luckily, she asked if we wanted tickets “atras del home,” or behind home. By the end of the game, the stadium was 15% full.

The Spanglish only got worse. Members of the crowd would yell phrases that began in Spanish but ended in English, usually for the postions: “Dejalo catcher!” or “Quita el pitcher!” Also, the Umpires yelled “Ball” and “Strike,” like the flashing sign in English in the outfield. I guess if Spanglish is likely to thrive anywhere, it’s in Mexican baseball.

I took some photos of the Oaxaca mascot, who posed for me, after fans yelled at him to tell him I was trying to take his picture. (Specifically, they yelled, “Look, the guera is trying to take your picture” in Spanish.) Actually, he rubbed his fingers together first, pretending to ask for money, then posed for the picture.

LMB

They also had a wierd secondary mascot for their Banamex (bank) sponsor, who was dressed as a “businessman” and would appear on the field whenever the cheerleaders came out to dance between some of the innings. He actually ended up seeming more like a wierd, puffy pimp.

LMB

You can see my Flickr slideshow with other pics, including a couple of the cheerleaders.

Updated: Brian suggested these links. How could I have not thought of that?
Salon de la Fama
Liga Mexicana de Beisbol
Also updated the post above with links to official and stat sites.

See pictures from Oaxaca

Brian is steady uploading the best pics from Oaxaca on his flickr.com account.

Unfortunately, our SD card with the picture of me with the person in the puffy suit was corrupted, so that gem was lost.

But pics from my first major league baseball game (Mexican league) and their mascot and wierd puffy suit person will be posted and commented upon soon.

Back from Oaxaca!

Whew! We made it back this afternoon. Oaxaca was wonderful. I think we visited nearly every museum, every set of ruins, a baseball game, and two of the nearby artisan towns. Once Brian posts pics to his Flickr account, I will post a link.

For Paul, I had my picture taken with a person in a big foam outfit made to look like the founder of one of the biggest pharmacy chains. It’s a hoot. (Oh, and pictures of the mascots from the baseball game, too.)

In the meantime, there’s a regulation conference tomorrow and Friday here in the D.F., so posting will be minimal.

The violence and fingerpointing continues

Wednesday and Thursday, four more people died as a result of organized crime violence in border states. Meanwhile, the governor of Sinolaa has admitted the inability to deal with drug violence, and Fox tried to organize discussions between federal and local authorities there.

With regard to the femicidios in Ciudad Juarez, the AG’s office announced that it would step up efforts to solve cases, and human rights groups were incredulous.

Femicidios have also become a problem in the President’s home state of Guanajuato. In the last five years, at least 168 women have been murdered, and already 23 this year. In Guanaguato, there is no mystery surround the murders as in Ciudad Juarez. Over 70 percent of the victims were murdered by a husband, partner, lover, or co-worker. There the problem is clearly one of interfamily violence.

I wonder, because I’ve never studied it, if studies have investigated whether violence against women increases as women enter the workforce more in more traditional societies. I ask because I believe in the last 20 years, at least, Mexican women have been working outside the home more. Is this a new source of family conflict? Conflicts over money or new friends at work? If someone hasn’t studied it, they should.

Wanted to buy: Items stolen from office

Or so the ad that is posted on this blog reads.

The ad is from a daily paper in Buenos Aires. But as Uzzi points out, it might as well be Mexico.

Let me tell you a short, true story. A friend of Brian’s was on the Mexico City subway with her mobile phone tucked in her blouse pocket. Some teenager grabbed the phone and jumped off the train at one of the stops before she could stop him. Her Mexican friend and she called the phone, and explained that it had important business contacts. This person said they had bought it from someone else for $30US. They offered to buy it for $50 or $100 or whatever. They made a date to meet. The same kid that had stolen the phone showed up. The Mexican friend snatched the phone back from the teenager and told them they shouldn’t steal.

Of course, that’s not as good as the story about the police officer who gave change for a bribe after they bargained down the price of the bribe (supposedly because the gringa did not have that much money with her).

Mexican prices

Dinner delivered: One rotisseried whole (but small) chicken, medium bag of potato chips, 2L coke, and 2 plastic bags full of salsa, generous tip for delivery boy, $7 US$

Tires rotated, balanced, and aligned with state of the art equipment at Firestone (and no, that’s not just me being sarcastic), $28 US$

Entire car washed, polished, and waxed by hand, buffed with buffer, plus tip for worker, $35 US$

Amnesty International on Mexico

The top news in the leftist La Jornada is the annual report issued by Amnesty International. On Mexico, AI says:

Human rights violations persisted, particularly at state level where arbitrary detention, torture and ill-treatment and the misuse of the judicial system were common. The federal government maintained its commitment to protect and promote human rights nationally and internationally. Legislation was proposed to strengthen human rights protection in the Constitution and the federal criminal justice system. A National Human Rights Programme was drawn up.

Federal intervention to combat violence against women in Ciudad Juárez continued with limited success. Two prisoners of conscience were released after more than a year in custody. A number of human rights defenders were threatened and three journalists were murdered. Progress in the prosecution of those responsible for past human rights violations was limited. Political violence surrounded local elections in various states.

The full entry for Mexico discusses Mexico’s human rights initiatives presented to the UN Commission on Human Rights, stalled and inadequate legislation, and the failure to address political disappearances in some states and the femicidios in Ciudad Juarez.

La Jornada has full coverage of the AI report on their front page.


La Jornada

In a related story, Fox’s spokesperson asserted that the President’s administration is an advocate of human rights protections and worries about the country’s international image. (Certainly. Since tourism is the third largest source of income after petroleum and remittances from workers in the U.S.)

The U.S. was also criticized in the AI report. Here’s an exchange with a reporter by President Bush’s spokesperson.

CineMa…movies for mothers

The largest chain of movie theatres in Mexico has a program called CineMa. On Thursdays and Saturdays at select theatres, they have special screenings in the morning for mothers and their babies. The screening costs the regular adult price of a ticket, though babies are free. The sound is turned down, the lights up a little, and they have valet parking for strollers. They also offer diapers, changing tables, towelettes, and bottle warmers. Though the movies are new movies, they are chosen for “young mothers” and their babies. So the current movie is Ice Princess. It’s a start anyway.

Violence along the border

Violence along the border has dominated the headlines this week. La Jornada has had over 20 news articles about the violence and government responses (or lack of responses) over the last three days alone. I can’t even begin to link to all the stories. But, I can summarize the main points.

First, the flurry of news coverage seems to have begun with the assassination of several (I mean seven or eight) people (public officials, bystanders, police, narcos) over the weekend. Gangland style. (I had the misfortune of accidently clicking on one of the stories that came with photos.) And it has only gotten worse throughout the week. There were 11 assassinations just yesterday in border states. Yesterday they reported 7 from the day before. The U.S. DEA attributes the violence to a war between cartels. Some of the deaths are due to street gun battles between police and narcos that leave univolved citizens dead or wounded.

What do the politicians do in response? Fox blames the Congress for not passng his judicial reform, and Congress blames Fox for his lack of leadership.

The other big story about violence on the border relates to the femicidios in the sister city of El Paso, Ciudad Juarez.

For years, hundreds of women have been killed and left in the desert. The last two women to be found brings the total to 19 so far for the year, which is more than last year at this time. (One of the two was a murder suicide.) Many young single women move to Ciudad Juarez looking for work in the border factories.

For a while, the U.S. FBI was assisting in the investigation. Some believe that the murders are the result of one or more serial killers or copycats. Some think it began with a cult of wealthy Mexicans who raped, killed, or hunted their servant women for sport. Others think that some are instances where husbands take advantage of the high murder rate to get rid of their wives. Apparently, some men use the murders to threaten their own wives.

In response to the recent public outcry, there will be another special investigation by the attorney general’s office. Fox has sent a new initiative to Congress. Secretary of State Creel is trying to promote the initiative. The Senate claims the President’s initiative will do little to solve the problem. And in the Chamber of Deputies, they criticized the President’s inability to stop the violence. ONGs, experts, and the Human Rights Commission all criticized Fox’s plan.

So what is Fox’s plan. One main part of his judicial reform calls for oral arguments in front of judges to expedite the trying of cases. Now, everything is done with piles and piles of papers, that all must be read by the judges. The criticism from others is that speeding up court cases will not help reduce violence if the penalties are not reformed (increased) and if the government cannot catch the killers.

Fox and Al Sharpton

In the midst of a slew of bad news and press due to increased violence and assassinations along the border, Fox took time to meet with Al Sharpton this week. The photo-op was much less jovial than that of Jesse Jackson.


From La Jornada, click on pic to go to story.

In fact, Al Sharpton left the meeting disappointed that he did not receivethe apology he came for. According to Sharpton, Fox still didn’t accept that he had offended anyone, and that regrets are not an apology. From the story in La Jornada:

El reverendo Al Sharpton salió ayer de su cita con el presidente Vicente Fox visiblemente insatisfecho, porque no recibió la disculpa formal que vino a buscar. “Fuimos ofendidos por el comentario”, insistió el luchador por los derechos civiles en Estados Unidos. “Entendí claramente la expresión y no estoy de acuerdo con lo que está argumentando el presidente en su defensa, porque nos está llamando estúpidos.”

A diferencia de la semana pasada, cuando vino a México el reverendo Jesse Jackson, a invitación del mandatario -quien lo convidó como parte de una estrategia para acallar susceptibilidades lastimadas a raíz de sus dichos sobre los negros-, ayer, en Los Pinos, no se programó conferencia de prensa para Al Sharpton….

“No aceptó que haya ofendido a nadie, pero esto no es aceptable para mí, porque pienso que la declaración fue ofensiva (…) La expresión es muy clara y así de clara debe ser la disculpa; el arrepentimiento no es disculpa”, insistió.

Well, at least Fox admits regrets, unlike some other Presidents we know.

Graffiti in Coyoacan

Snapped this picture a few weeks back.

In the interest of being fair and balanced, I should note that there’s a fountain near my house with anti-Lopez Obrador graffiti. I just haven’t gotten around to taking a picture of it yet. (It’s the one can, single line, done in the middle of the night variety. Whereas the graffiti in the picture above was done by the neighborhood committee.)

My students can be funny

So today was the final exam in my stats class. I gave the students the statistical results from Table 3 of this paper on beauty and teacher evaluations.

One of the questions was: In Model 1, explain the substantive and statical significance of the effect of Beauty on Teacher Ratings.

This was the answer (translated into English):
The effect of the variable beauty is positive on the grade that is given to teachers. For each additional point that a teacher earns in beauty, they will obrain .275 points more on their grade for teacher performance. The effect is very impressive, that if Lindsay Lohan gave me class (Beauty=100) although she may be a lousy teacher, the model would predict a great increase in her evaluations.

[Unfortunately, he forgot to mention the statistical significance of beauty.]

Short car update

Called #8 again. This time a woman said that I don’t have to do anything. According to the Reglamento de Comercio Exterior (Foreign trade regulation), # 3.2.6 (which is what the other girl cited me), published in the Diario Oficial on March 23, 2005 (pages 168-170), I don’t have to do anything. The car permit is automatically extended to conform with my visa.

There is some language about notifying customs of the change in my migratory status within 14 days of the change, but the woman said that doesn’t apply to people who paid their import fees with a credit card. It only applies to people who paid a deposit in cash, and who want their cash back. According to her, they can’t charge my credit card because I did not leave an open voucher (which is true). So, I guess that means that they have no way to penalize you for overstaying your car’s visa if you pay with a credit card and return late or without ‘checking in’. But they can keep you from improting another car.

In any event, I must now photocopy my visa and print the regulation to carry in the car so that I can explain the new law to any police officers that try to stop me after my permit expires. Joy. I would almost rather wait in line somewhere or drive all the back to Texas to avoid dealing with the Mexican police.

They are trying, though, to make it easier for foreigners to enter the country and bring their vehicles.

Now about the car…

We entered Mexico again in January as tourists because my official (Fulbright) visa as a researcher was still not ready. (We had been waiting since August.) Because we entered as tourists, they gave us a 180 day permit for our car. This permit expires at the beginning of July. We do not plan to leave until late July.

Last week, after 2 trips to the Immigration offices (and 8 months of waiting), I finally picked up my official visa–less than 8 weeks before we are ready to leave the country.

Now, I have to figure out how to extend the permit on my car for an additional 2-3 weeks.

Call 1: I call the main government information number. They give me a number. I call. They can’t help me at that number.

Call 2: I call the main information number again. They try to tell me that I can’t get an extension. I don’t believe them. Ask for another number. They give me another number.

Call 3: I call the new number which is the Secretary of the Economy. They give me another number. (I have no idea where this number is.)

Call 4: I call this new number. They tell me that I handle these things at an office at Hidalgo 77, Col. Guerrero, Window #5. I ask for the Hidalgo phone number. They don’t have it, but say try these other ones.

Call 5: I call this new number. After I explain my situation twice, the woman puts me on hold. She tells me that according to Article 106 of the Customs Law, I am entitled to bring my car into the country for 180 days. But, she says that I am able to override the original permit if my migratory status changes, and then, I can keep the car as long as my visa is valid. All this is according to section 4, part a of article 106 of the customs law. (Ok, this I already knew….not the exact law, but I knew I could extend the permit.)

I ask the woman, so how do I go about changing my car’s papers. She tells me that I can do it according to regulation 3.2.6 at any one of the 48 customs offices in the country.

But what do I need to bring with me? My migratory document, car papers, and a “escrito libre” with (in rapid fire spanish) my name, address, acitivities in Mexico, the authority to whom I address the request, the request citing the law and regulations that she already told me.

Ok. But what exactly is a “escrito libre.” Forgive me, I don’t understand. Is it something a lawyer has to write? Can I write it myself? Should it be notarized? Could you tell me again exactly what it needs to include, otherwise they will reject me?

She tells me again, more slowly this time. And in a monotone.

So where is the closest of the 48 customs offices established by law?

She gives me an address on Avenida Cuitlahuac in Colonia Cosmopolita. Of course, she does not offer a phone number. Her name is Elaine (??) Torres. I ask, what about Hidalgo #77, is that one of the 48 customs offices established by law? No, it is not, she says.

Call 6: I call Telmex information to get the number for Mexican customs on Cuitlahuac. I get the correct number on the first try.

Call 7: I call customs on Cuitlahuac and explain what I need. The person tells me that they handle such requests at the Hidalgo #77 office. I ask for that number.

Call 8: I call Hidalgo #77. The person who answers says that I have the wrong extension, but they will transfer me. Another woman answers. Yes, this is the area that handles such paperwork, but it is lunchtime (3:20). Could you call back after 4pm? Fine. Sigh. Smile. Could you give me the exact extension? Yes: 9157-3394; 9157-6569; 9157-3893.

We’ll see if they can help me after lunch on call #9.

If you want to read about a similar experience that I had with Migracion, check out this post on the slow burn.